<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sean Sharp's ITRT Blog &#187; article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sharpsitrt.edublogs.org/tag/article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sharpsitrt.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>A blog on things Instructional, Technological, and Educational.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:22:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Literacy Debate &#8211; Online, R U Really Reading?</title>
		<link>http://sharpsitrt.edublogs.org/2008/07/26/literacy-debate-online-r-u-really-reading/</link>
		<comments>http://sharpsitrt.edublogs.org/2008/07/26/literacy-debate-online-r-u-really-reading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nytimes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharpsitrt.edublogs.org/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Literacy Debate &#8211; Online, R U Really Reading? &#8211; Series &#8211; NYTimes.com
The above linked article is well worth the read. Will Richardson blogged about this article, which is how I found it. I found his blog post via Twitter, for those who are interested.
Some of my thoughts, briefly tonight, are that reading and literacy need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/27/books/27reading.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=2&amp;hp">Literacy Debate &#8211; Online, R U Really Reading? &#8211; Series &#8211; NYTimes.com</a></p>
<p>The above linked article is well worth the read. Will Richardson <a href="http://weblogg-ed.com/2008/kids-prefer-reading-online/" target="_blank">blogged</a> about this article, which is how I found it. I found his blog post via Twitter, for those who are interested.</p>
<p>Some of my thoughts, briefly tonight, are that reading and literacy need to be taught to our students. By reading I mean all kinds of reading&#8211;both online and offline. There really needs to be an exposure to all kinds of text, including long novels, good non-fiction essays, and even short blog posts read through an rss feed aggregator. I agree with this quote on page four from the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>Even those who are most concerned about the preservation of books acknowledge that children need a range of reading experiences. “Some of it is the informal reading they get in e-mails or on Web sites,” said Gay Ivey, a professor at James Madison University who focuses on adolescent literacy. “I think they need it all.”</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a good article and a good topic to consider. As school begins in a little over two weeks for me, this article is one that I will ask teachers to read and discuss.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
  addthis_url    = 'http%3A%2F%2Fsharpsitrt.edublogs.org%2F2008%2F07%2F26%2Fliteracy-debate-online-r-u-really-reading%2F';
  addthis_title  = 'Literacy+Debate+%26%238211%3B+Online%2C+R+U+Really+Reading%3F';
  addthis_pub    = '';
</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/addthis_widget.php?v=12" ></script>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sharpsitrt.edublogs.org/2008/07/26/literacy-debate-online-r-u-really-reading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
